Democrats on Senate Environmental Quality Committee Hold Key to Transparency and Public Participation in California Envrironment

[courtesy of California Progress Report]

By Frank D. Russo

Every year the California Legislature hears new legislation related to the California Environmental Quality Act or CEQA. This law allows public agencies to make informed decisions about the health and environmental impacts of proposed new projects. CEQA requires public agencies to review the environmental impacts of proposed projects, and if there are significant impacts, to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR), which considers feasible alternatives and mitigation measures that would reduce adverse environmental effects. The law also gives local citizens a chance to participate in the process.

Most bills introduced in the legislature seek to streamline the CEQA process or carve out special exemptions for various types of projects. Last year, for example Senate Republicans held the state budget up trying to tie the hands of the Attorney General in enforcing this basic environmental law. This year however, SB 1165 by Senator Sheila Kuehl, seeks to strengthen the statute and actually enhance public participation

But it needs the support of at least two of the following three Democratic members of the Senate Environmental Quality Committee to advance: Joe Simitian, Chair of the Committee, Dean Flores, and soon to be President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg. Since Republican legislators usually vote against any bill to strengthen CEQA, in counting votes, GOP Senators George Runner and Sam Aanestad are almost assured “no votes.” The bill has the support of the author, Kuehl, and Democrat Alan Lowenthal is expected to support it. Five votes are needed.

According to the Planning and Conservation League, the bill’s sponsor, SB 1165 ensures greater transparency in the creation of draft EIRs and requires EIRs older than five years to be reviewed again for new impacts before they can be used to approve a project.

CEQA currently allows project applicants to comment extensively on early drafts and even allows the project applicant to write the entire document. Since the public is not privy to the contents of the draft, it has no way of assessing whether those with financial interests in the project have unduly influenced the contents of the EIR. Current law also allows the use of outdated EIRs and places the burden on the public to demonstrate the need for a new review. By improving public participation, SB 1165 will result in better projects and thus, less litigation—something all reasonable folks should agree on.

During the public testimony taken on the bill in the Senate Environmental Quality Committee this past Monday, supporters of the measure urged the committee members to support SB 1165 and laid out several examples of past abuses which prompted the bills introduction.