[courtesy of California Progress Report]

By Robert Cruickshank

With the announcement yesterday of Dennis Morris' write-in candidacy for the Democratic nomination in SD-15, alongside four other candidacies which I'll discuss in a moment, we now have a renewed opportunity to win a 2/3 majority in the State Senate this fall.

Democrats in California have been slow to recognize this opportunity and to take full advantage of it. Don Perata is partly to blame for this, as he blew two priceless chances to help accomplish 2/3 by not finding a challenger to Abel Maldonado here in SD-15, and by prematurely abandoning his backing of the Denham recall a few weeks ago. But despite the lack of support from Sacramento, grassroots activists across the state have mobilized and even put forth candidates to challenge Republicans, in districts both purple and red.

The 2/3 goal is one of the most important tasks facing California Democrats this year. As the state budget requires a 2/3 majority to pass, Republicans are able to leverage their greater-than-a-third minority to hold the budget and therefore the entire state hostage to their ridiculous and reckless demands for spending cuts that hurt the economy and most Californians.

by Robert in Monterey [courtesy of Calitics - Front Page]

[courtesy of California Progress Report]

By Robert Cruickshank

In November 2002, after winning a close re-election battle against Republican Bill Simon, Gray Davis announced to Californians that the budget deficit had swelled to $35 billion. In response the state's media denounced Davis as having caused the crisis and hiding the real facts from voters. In this atmosphere the recall effort that began in early 2003 caught on like wildfire, as the deficit was blamed on Davis, instead of on Tom McClintock's tax cuts or the economic downturn.

Six years later we find ourselves in a similar place. The economy is in a downturn and state revenues are being hammered. Arnold Schwarzenegger is now warning that the deficit could be as large as $20 billion. So how does the media react?

Well, if you're the San Francisco Chronicle's Matthew Yi, you talk about how this might help the governor and his proposed budget reforms:

by Robert in Monterey [courtesy of Calitics - Front Page]

by Brian Leubitz [courtesy of Calitics - Front Page]

by Julia Rosen [courtesy of Calitics - Front Page]

by Julia Rosen [courtesy of Working Californians blogs]

Arnold refuses to take a comprehensive look at the problems that have created our budget deficit and now appears to be pushing what essentially amounts to Prop. 76. It is a power grab, short and simple. The voters rejected it overwhelmingly in 2005, with 62.4% voting NO. It was a bad idea to give the governor more power over the budget then and it is still a bad idea now. SacBee:

Heading into a week in which he's expected to deliver grim news about the state's fiscal health, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is also preparing to propose changes to the budgeting process.

The Republican governor will offer a "budget reform" plan when he outlines his goals in his State of the State address Tuesday. Such a proposal, if successful, would likely give the executive office more authority in making cuts even after the Legislature has passed an annual spending plan.

When Arnold talks about budget reforms, he means being able to cut the budget whenever he feels like it. Meanwhile Nunez has some ideas of his own.