energy bill
After the Energy Bill: All Eyez on the EPA
by WarmingLaw [courtesy of Calitics - Front Page]
(Cross-posted from Warming Law)
It's a shame that Roll Call operates behind a subscription wall, because Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA), who chairs the House's special committee on global warming, has a great op-ed there today summarizing where things stand moving forward from the solid energy bill framework that congressional Democrats hope to pass, "Global Warming At the Starting Gate." One key highlight:
Seventeen states (representing over 46 percent of Americans) have adopted or will soon adopt global warming emissions standards for vehicles. The federal district court in Vermont recently held that federal law does not prohibit such measures. What remains to be seen this year is whether the Bush EPA will grant these states the waiver they need to enforce these tailpipe standards, or spurn their ambitious action.
read more »
- Read original article
- Login or register to post comments
Don't Drop Incentives for Renewable Energy from Conference Energy Bill
by Ronald Cloud [courtesy of Blog for America]
Macon, GA 31210
November 14, 2007
The Honorable Tim Ryan
The Honorable Debbie Wasserman Schultz
The Honorable Christopher Murphy
United States House of Representatives
Regards: Energy Bill Surrender
Dear Representatives Ryan, Wasserman Schultz, and Murphy:
It was a great pleasure to view the exchanges among the three of you on the House floor
during C-SPAN coverage one evening last June. A discerning listener might detect partisanship and scripting in your remarks. That's fine with me. Having tuned in to the opposing partisans' radio jockeys during their 24-hour domination of talk radio over the public's airwaves, I found myself wishing that same audience and medium would devote equal time to the intellectually stimulating, well reasoned, arguments that each of you made in turn.
The central theme that I followed in your arguments was the case that what Congress does matters.
It makes a difference in:
how well the majority of our citizens can make a living,
whether, or not, we are able to engage in "the pursuit of happiness" that is our birthright,
and whether, or not, our children and grandchildren will live better or worse than those of us responsible for today's decisions.
- Read original article
- Login or register to post comments
Your Voice is Needed on Vermont's Energy Future
by Dan Sullivan [courtesy of Blog for America]
At CSDFA's recent monthly meeting, Chris Williams of Citizen's Action Network, gave a good update on why the Vermont Yankee license should not be renewed and Sean Sarah, of VPIRG, talked to realistic alternatives. The thing that stood out to me was the practicality of wind power. Sean mentioned that the Sheffield wind project was recently approved and that it would take only 5-10 Sheffields to provide 20% of Vermont's electrical needs. This is very doable by 2012 and would be cost competitive, particularly with unsubsidized sources of power. This, along with some not particularly painful energy efficiency steps would go a long way towards replacing Vermont Yankee's output.
- Read original article
- Login or register to post comments
Schrag: Corn Ethanol Subsidy a California Presidential Primary Issue?
[courtesy of California Progress Report]

By Peter Schrag
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must welcome the heat she's getting for wobbling on the farm and energy bills. Having caved in to Detroit on fuel economy standards and compromised with Midwest agro-plutocrats on crop subsidies for millionaires, she's shown that she's more a pragmatic Baltimore pol like her father than a knee-jerk San Francisco liberal. That'll serve her well.
Both the farm and the energy bills won approval in the House in the past couple of weeks. Both are monuments to waste, stupidity and policy distortions going back generations -- longer in the case of the ag subsidies.
Pelosi says she hopes the Senate energy bill, which contains a sharp increase in fuel economy requirements -- from roughly 25 miles per gallon to 35 -- for cars and trucks, will prevail over the House version when the two are reconciled. She said it almost the same day that we learned that for the first time ever foreign models were outselling Detroit.
More significant, maybe, is the fact that the farm law -- and agricultural policy generally -- is morphing into an energy program. The bill, HR 2419, which calls itself the "Farm, Nutrition and Bioenergy Act of 2007," has oodles of incentives for the development and transportation of renewable fuels.
- Read original article
- Login or register to post comments
July 3, 2007 Blog Roundup
by jsw [courtesy of Calitics - Front Page]
Lots of posts in the California blogs in the last 24 hours, almost all of them on Bush commuting Scooter Libby's sentence (it's good to be the king -- or his friend). Actual California stuff I found below the fold. As always, if I missed something, post it in comments.
Incidentally, I noticed that for some reason the links sometimes appear as plain text in the RSS feed. They do seem to show up as hyperlinks in the emailed roundup. I'll see what I can do about that. Until then, just click through for hyperlinking.
- Read original article
- Login or register to post comments
Attempt to Overturn CA Emission's Rules is Dead
by Julia Rosen [courtesy of Working Californians blogs]
It is official, Rep. Dingell and Rep. Boucher have dropped their effort to overrule California's tailpipe greenhouse gas emissions law, at least for now. Their proposal ran into the strong opposition from Speaker Pelosi, environmentalist and California elected officials. They had continued pushing the issue until yesterday, when they pulled it out of the energy bill currently under consideration in the House. SFChron:
The pair sent a memo on Monday to members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, saying they would soon release a final version of the Democratic energy bill that would not contain the proposal to pre-empt California and other states from their plan to cut greenhouse gases. Other contentious provisions also would be dropped, the lawmakers said.
"You will note that a number of the more controversial issues we raised, such as coal-to-liquid fuels, fuel economy standards, a low-carbon fuel standard, various mandates, and the role of federal and state programs, are not included," Dingell, the committee chairman, and Boucher wrote in the memo.
read more »
- Read original article
- Login or register to post comments

