gun control advocates
GUN CONTROL ADVOCATES ROLL THE DICE (STUPIDLY!) ON LIKELY LANDMARK ‘RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS’ SECOND AMENDMENT CASE
[courtesy of California Progress Report]

By Bill Cavala
A veteran of over 30 years in Sacramento
The District of Columbia, marred by gun murders, passed a local ordinance banning the private possession of handguns.
The NRA et. al. filed lawsuits saying the government did not have the right to do so because of the prohibition of the Second Amendment to the Federal Constitution which establishes the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
Back in the 1930’s, the US Supreme Court opinioned that the “right to keep and bear arms” was a right held by State Militias and not individual citizens. For the last 80 years, guns zealots have argued that the Court’s interpretation was wrong – that the Founder’s intent was to protect the gun in each American’s home.
For better or worse, however, gun zealots don’t determine the Constitution’s meaning. The US Supreme Court does.
- Read original article
- Login or register to post comments

