state constitution

The Fight for Marriage Equality Continues

[courtesy of Blog for America]

The Los Angeles Times reports on a constitutional amendment initiative in California which would outlaw marriage equality:

Setting the stage for a political showdown, the California secretary of state today said an initiative barring gay marriage had enough signatures to qualify for the Nov. 4 ballot.

The proposal would amend the state Constitution to define marriage as a union "between a man and a woman" and undo last month's historic California Supreme Court ruling, which found that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation was unconstitutional.

Danny

Communications Director

Support Marriage Equality

[courtesy of California Progress Report]

Gavin-Newsom-Supreme-Court-.gif

By Gavin Newsom
Mayor
San Francisco

California has always been a place where traditional barriers of class, race, gender have been pushed aside by a spirit of equality and opportunity that says to all - no matter who you are, and no matter where you come from - "It Can Be Done."

In that spirit, yet one more barrier gave way when the California State Supreme Court ruled that all Californians - regardless of the traditional barrier of sexual orientation - have the right to marry.

This is an historic moment - both for California and our country. From this moment forward, there can be no going back.

The road ahead will be difficult. Despite today's historic ruling, the same groups that sponsored the 2000 California ballot measure that challenged marriage equality are getting closer to placing a measure on the November ballot that would write discrimination into our state Constitution. This effort would not only overturn laws granting the most basic rights to same-sex couples - it would effectively nullify today's Supreme Court ruling.

Stand up for Marriage Equality today. Sign the petition now.

Registrar Still Refusing to Count "Double Bubble Trouble" Ballots

by Julia Rosen [courtesy of Calitics - Front Page]

(full disclosure: I work for the Courage Campaign)

Dean Logan, the acting Registrar of Voters in Los Angeles issued a detailed

read more »

Just some thoughts

by Barry Sussman [courtesy of Blog for America]

Governor Corzine is getting Florioed. Lest anyone forget, Jim Florio was the last governor with a balanced budget as prescribed by the State Constitution. For his efforts, Governor Florio was targeted by the precursor of Swift Boat Veterans, Hands Across New Jersey. Through relentless attacks in the media, Governor Florio was pilloried for balancing the budget on the backs of those who could most afford it. Hands Across New Jersy was a well funded public relations effort by New Jersey's wealthiest residents to avoid paying their fair share.

As a result we were cursed with the Whitman plan to bankrupt our treasury. Since Whitman's pandering to short sighted voters worked, we have been in a fiscal hole that Governor Corzine is trying to close. There are no easy solutions. When tough decisions are made, someone gets hurt.

For the past few months there have been a barrage of letters in the Star-Ledger chastizing the governor for his plans to close the hole caused by Whitman's irresponsible, politically expedient plan. Everyone is demanding the governor make cuts in wasteful spending. The problem is, one person's waste in another's life support.

read more »

Voter Guides and Articles on All California Ballot Propositions

[courtesy of California Progress Report]

frankrusso-small.jpg By Frank D. Russo

Don’t forget to vote on California Ballot Propositions when you cast your ballot for Presidential candidates—otherwise other voters will be deciding these important state issues for you.

Need more information? Here’s a listing of articles on the California Progress Report on each of the ballot propositions and a list of other references where you can find out what you need to know to cast an informed vote.

Proposition 91 is a Constitutional Amendment on transportation funding. All you need to do is to consult your voter guide from the Secretary of State’s Office and you’ll see right here that the proponents who have placed this on the ballot have the only argument—and they say to vote no because it is no longer needed. This one is easy--don't mess up the state constitution with this one.

read more »

Proposition 93: Even Ugly Babies Need Love

by jsw [courtesy of Calitics - Front Page]

Disclaimer:  I am paid by exactly no-one to advocate for any political position.  I've heard rumors that certain people would actually pay me to stop.

There's been a lot of heat, and not as much light as would be ideal, generated around Proposition 93, the ballot initiative to extend (a bit) the current legislative term limits.  I have already turned in my absentee ballot, and I voted for Proposition 93, despite its manifest flaws.  If you're interested in why (and my take on those flaws), it's below the fold.

read more »

Tribes Must Halt All Efforts to Add Illegal Slots in California

[courtesy of California Progress Report]

CherylSchmit.jpg By Cheryl A. Schmit
Founder and Director of Stand Up for California

You may have read one of the numerous news reports that somehow the unfair gambling deals the Big 4 tribes cut for themselves in Sacramento – and that await voters as Propositions 94, 95, 96 and 97 on the February 5 ballot – have been approved by the federal government. That’s not quite true for a number of reasons.

The compact must first be validly entered into under state constitutional law. Since nearly 3 million signatures were gathered to put the deals on the ballot, the deals await the decision of California voters under the referendum process authorized in the State Constitution. If voters reject the deals, California can’t be a party to them and there would be nothing for the federal government to review or approve.

read more »
Syndicate content