by Lucas O'Connor [courtesy of Calitics - Front Page]

[courtesy of California Progress Report]

By Peter Schrag

You don't have to read between the lines of Legislative Analyst Elizabeth Hill's "Alternate Budget" to understand its basic message: The governor couldn't have been serious in his own budget proposals.

The governor's plan, she said, "reflects little effort to prioritize and determine which state programs provide essential services or are most critical to California's future. In doing so, the administration has shifted much of the responsibility for crafting a workable budget to the Legislature."

The fiercely nonpartisan LAO is supposed to analyze, question, suggest. An alternate budget that includes revenues increases is unprecedented. It says: If you can't do it, let us show you how. If the Legislature were controlled by the current crop of Republicans, she'd probably be looking for a job.

Predictably, much of the attention went to Hill's tax heresies. She actually proposed increasing revenues, largely by closing some $2.65 billion in what she regards as unproductive or unjustified tax loopholes.